WSF 2008 - Belgium
Walking around in Brussels ...
The Global Action Day and the Social Forum of Belgium
Diversity
is one of the main characteristics of the global justice movement. And
one of its consequences is that the movement looks very differently
whether you look at it from the global, the regional, the national or
the local level.
In Europe, the alterglobalist movement is not
extremely dynamic, or should we simply state that it is not as dynamic
as its counterparts in Latin America or Asia? The overall wealth of an
ageing population, the rejection of leftwing politics by a majority of
people that lived for 40 years under communism and the very fragmented
leftwing parties in Western Europe are all elements that help to
explain why the global justice movement remains rather weak.
Belgium
is no exception. It has a national social forum in which the French
speaking South and the Dutch speaking North work together, and this is
certainly one of its major advantages. The differences between the more
dynamic South and the more pragmatic North are indeed rather important
though no one wants a split. Working together helps to promote unity in
diversity and to look for convergence at this basic level.
All
the same, the Social Forum of Belgium is somewhat unbalanced. In the
North, leftwing forces are very weak, the main partners in the Forum
are the trade unions and the third world NGOs, whereas the South has a
broader range of social movements that participate in different
actions. Horizontalism has more success in the South than in the North.
All in all, French speaking movements play a more active role in the
Forum.
The major social movements in Belgium remain however
outside the Forum. Ecologists, human rights defenders, movements of the
poor and of migrant workers are not represented. A very dynamic
‘Network’ working around alternative finances is not a member of the
Forum either. The women’s movements are rather weak in Belgium.
Nevertheless,
January 26th 2008 can be seen as a modest success. About 1000 people
were mobilized in Brussels for a series of alternative tours. Twelve
major issues had been selected: peace, health care, taxes, food
sovereignty, environment, freedom of speech, decent work, development,
migration, water, housing and public services. In different parts of
the city, tents had been built where short performances were presented,
where information was given about the thematic issues and where people
stood by and watched. Guided tours were organized along the different
sites in the centre of Brussels. On a Saturday afternoon, this
inevitably helped to reach a lot of people who in fact where only there
to do some shopping but who went home with some clear political
messages.
In the evening, a debate was organized with GCAP, the
trade unions and some other movements. According to the Social Forum
philosophy, no specific demands were made, though this point certainly
gave rise to difficult internal discussions.
This modest success
has strengthened the movement in Belgium, though there is also a clear
need to discuss its future strategies. Too many movements remain
outside and the Forum has no political influence. Another world is
possible, and maybe we should also say: another social forum is
possible.
Francine Mestrum